<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Exoplanet | Huanyu Teng</title><link>https://hyteng.netlify.app/tag/exoplanet/</link><atom:link href="https://hyteng.netlify.app/tag/exoplanet/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Exoplanet</description><generator>Wowchemy (https://wowchemy.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Stellar Obliquity and Young Systems</title><link>https://hyteng.netlify.app/project/obliquity/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://hyteng.netlify.app/project/obliquity/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="font-colordodgerblueshort-introductionfont">&lt;font color=dodgerblue>Short Introduction&lt;/font>&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>The stellar obliquity, a probe to planet migration history, is the angle between the rotation axis of the host star and the normal of the orbital plane of the planet.
Various migration theories with different timescales, e.g., primordial disk misalignment (&amp;lt; 3 Myr), Kozai-Lidov mechanism (10 kyr - 100 Myr), secular chaos (10 Myr - 100 Myr),
differ strongly in their predictions on the obliquity. These mechanisms all functions during the youth of the planetary systems (&amp;lt; 1 Gyr).
Young planetary systems are the promising targets to constrain the models and timescales of planetary formation and migration.&lt;/p>
&lt;font size=3>
&lt;h2 id="related-works">Related works:&lt;/h2>
&lt;a href="https://hyteng.netlify.app/publication/teng2024/" target="_blank"> “The ∼50Myr Old TOI-942c is Likely on an Aligned, Coplanar Orbit and Losing Mass”&lt;/a>
&lt;/font></description></item><item><title>Exoplanet searching around evolved stars</title><link>https://hyteng.netlify.app/project/opsp/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://hyteng.netlify.app/project/opsp/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="font-colordodgerbluebackgroundfont">&lt;font color=dodgerblue>Background&lt;/font>&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>To date, more than 5000 extra-solar planets (exoplanets) have been detected around different types of stars.
These exoplanets were detected by different methods, among which the radial velocity (RV) method (Doppler method) contributed to around 800 of them.
For these planets, about 60% are detected around solar-mass (0.7–1.5 M&lt;sub>⊙&lt;/sub>) stars, while only about 1% are detected around intermediate-mass (1.5–5.0 M&lt;sub>⊙&lt;/sub>).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Intermediate-mass stars are B- or A- or F-type stars at main sequence, and G- or K- type at more evolved stages (subgiants and giants).
Compared to their main-sequence counterparts, these stars are better for planet searching with RV method because they rotate slowly and have sharp absorption lines.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Since the intermediate-mass stars have shorter lifetime than less-massive stars, they are valuable objects to constrain the mechanism and timescale of planet formation.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>There are two popular planet formation scenarios for gaseous giant planets.
One is core accretion, which has a timescale of about a few million years. In this model, a rocky core forms through the coagulation of planetesimals until it is sufficiently massive (about 10 M&lt;sub>⊕&lt;/sub>) to accrete a gaseous envelope.
Another one is disk instability, which has a timescale of about only a few thousand years. In this model, gas giant planet forms directly as a result of (local) gravitational instability in the protoplanetary disk.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>To characterize how the giant planets are and to recover how they form, it is urgent to survey intermediate-mass stars at their evolved stages.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="font-colordodgerblueissues-in-my-researchfont">&lt;font color=dodgerblue>Issues in my research&lt;/font>&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Thanks to large surveys during the last 20 years, more interesting issues are realized about giant planet populations.
Here I present some of them which are within my interest:&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="planet-desert">&amp;ldquo;Planet desert&amp;rdquo;&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Close-in (a &amp;lt; 0.6 au), low-mass (Mp &amp;lt; 0.6M&lt;sub>J&lt;/sub> ) planets were seldom found around intermediate-mass planets.
Especially for more evolved giant stars, most detected planets reside at more than 0.5 au from their hosts.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The desert could be attributed to a scaling of the proto-planetary disk mass with the mass of the central star, and it could also be a result of planet engulfment while a star is ascending the red giant branch.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Related publication:&lt;/p>
&lt;a href="https://hyteng.netlify.app/publication/teng2023a/" target="_blank">“A Close-in Planet Orbiting Giant Star HD 167768”&lt;/a>
&lt;h3 id="the-giant-planet-metallicity-correlation">The giant-planet metallicity correlation&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Among all detected giant exoplanets, they are more likely to reside around metal-rich stars.
For the evolved stars, the existence of giant-planet–metallicity correlation is a more popular.
But some give no clear correlation. It is somewhat under-debating&amp;hellip;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Related publication:&lt;/p>
&lt;a href="https://hyteng.netlify.app/publication/teng2023b/" target="_blank">“Revisiting Planetary Systems in Okayama Planet Search Program: A new long-period planet, RV astrometry joint analysis, and multiplicity-metallicity trend around evolved stars.”&lt;/a>
&lt;a href="https://hyteng.netlify.app/publication/teng2022b/" target="_blank">“Regular radial velocity variations in nine G- and K-type giant stars: Eight planets and one planet candidate”&lt;/a>
&lt;h3 id="multiplicity-of-giant-planets">Multiplicity of giant planets&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>To date, there are around 30 multi-planet systems discovered around deeply evolved stars (log&lt;em>g&lt;/em>&amp;lt;3.5).
Most of them are in the pattern of massive planet pairs and having intermediate periods (100 ~ 1000 days), and many of pairs are considered to be in mean motion resonance.
Why are they mostly in pairs? What have they experienced?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Related publication:&lt;/p>
&lt;a href="https://hyteng.netlify.app/publication/teng2022b/" target="_blank">“A Trio of Giant Planets Orbiting Evolved Star HD 184010”&lt;/a>
&lt;h2 id="font-colordodgerbluedata-in-my-researchfont">&lt;font color=dodgerblue>Data in my research&lt;/font>&lt;/h2>
&lt;h3 id="observations">Observations&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>I use precise radial velocity data within the framework of &lt;a href="https://academic.oup.com/pasj/article/57/1/97/1482229" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Okayama Planet Search Program&lt;/a> and its extended programs.&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="statistics">Statistics&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Data are obtained from &lt;a href="https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">NASA Exoplanet Archive&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="http://exoplanet.eu/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Exoplanet.eu&lt;/a>.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Exoplanet searching around cool stars</title><link>https://hyteng.netlify.app/project/mdwarf/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://hyteng.netlify.app/project/mdwarf/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="font-colordodgerblueshort-introductionfont">&lt;font color=dodgerblue>Short Introduction&lt;/font>&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Not like solar-like stars, which are hard to detect Earth analogs in the habitable zone (HZ) for their low possibility of transit (&amp;lt;1%, ~1/year) and weak RV signals (~0.1 m/s), cool stars such as mid-to-late M-dwarfs, are promising targets to search for habitable planets because they are much cooler and thus with closer HZ as well as stronger and detectable RV signals (~1-5m/s). In addition, studies on planet occurrence revealed that terrestrial planets are more likely to reside around M dwarfs.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="font-colordodgerblueprogramfont">&lt;font color=dodgerblue>Program&lt;/font>&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Subaru/IRD is one of the most powerful near-infrared spectrograph mounted on large-aperture telescopes with capability in detecting Earth analogs around cool stars. I am in the project of IRD-SSP (PI: Bun&amp;rsquo;ei Sato), an exoplanet survey in the framework of the Subaru Strategic Program (SSP), and IRD TESS Intensive Follow-up Project (PI: Norio Narita).&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Other studies in exoplanets</title><link>https://hyteng.netlify.app/project/other/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://hyteng.netlify.app/project/other/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="font-colordodgerbluea-wide-interestfont">&lt;font color=dodgerblue>A wide interest&amp;hellip;&lt;/font>&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>I have a wide interest in exoplanetary world, and am now working with people in diverse fields, including joint characterization using radial velocity and astrometry, planets around more evolved stars (AGB stars), orbital evolution of planetary systems, planet population, stellar jitter modeling&amp;hellip;&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>